Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

King County v. BP P.L.C., 2:18-cv-00758. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180613i05 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 7(d) (1) AND 10(g) ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . The Court, having received and reviewed the Parties' Stipulated Motion, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants will file their responses to the Complaint by July 27, 2018. 2. Defendants shall coordinate their efforts to file a consolidated memorandum of law in support of their
More

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 7(d) (1) AND 10(g)

The Court, having received and reviewed the Parties' Stipulated Motion, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendants will file their responses to the Complaint by July 27, 2018.

2. Defendants shall coordinate their efforts to file a consolidated memorandum of law in support of their motions to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and/or 12(b)(6). If any Defendant wishes to file its own, individual memorandum in support of a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and/or 12(b)(6), it shall only advance arguments unique to the Defendant filing the individual memorandum and shall not repeat arguments advanced in the consolidated memorandum.

3. Any Defendant that wishes to challenge personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, or insufficient service of process will file an individual memorandum of law pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), (4), and/or (5). As part of efforts to consolidate and organize briefing, the Parties have agreed, and this Court acknowledges, that the restrictions in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(g) and 12(h) regarding multiple motions to dismiss do not apply to motions to dismiss filed by July 27, 2018.

4. Plaintiff shall serve any responses to Defendants' motions to dismiss by September 14, 2018.

5. Defendants shall serve their reply briefs by October 5, 2018. Defendants shall file a consolidated reply memorandum of law in support of their motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and/or 12(b)(6) regarding arguments made in Defendants' opening consolidated memorandum.

6. Neither the Stipulated Motion nor this Order shall operate as an admission of any factual allegation or legal conclusion, nor shall it operate as a waiver of any right, defense, affirmative defense, claim, or objection, including lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, or insufficient service of process.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer