Rose M.V. v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-01142. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20190322g65
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND REMANDING CASE ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). 1 On February 4, 2019, Judge Furse issued a Report and Recommendation. 2 Judge Furse recommends remanding the case because the ALJ improperly evaluated the opinions of Plaintiff's treating physician. 3 Neither party objects to Judge Furse's Report and Recommendation, so the court
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND REMANDING CASE ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). 1 On February 4, 2019, Judge Furse issued a Report and Recommendation. 2 Judge Furse recommends remanding the case because the ALJ improperly evaluated the opinions of Plaintiff's treating physician. 3 Neither party objects to Judge Furse's Report and Recommendation, so the court ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND REMANDING CASE
ROBERT J. SHELBY, Chief District Judge.
The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).1 On February 4, 2019, Judge Furse issued a Report and Recommendation.2 Judge Furse recommends remanding the case because the ALJ improperly evaluated the opinions of Plaintiff's treating physician.3 Neither party objects to Judge Furse's Report and Recommendation, so the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.4
Having carefully considered Judge Furse's Report and Recommendation, the court finds no clear error. The court therefore ADOPTS Judge Furse's Report and Recommendation and REMANDS this case so the ALJ can properly evaluate the opinions of Plaintiff's treating physician.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Dkt. 14.
2. Dkt. 23.
3. Id. at 1-2, 13-20.
4. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court for N. Dist. of Cal., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879).
Source: Leagle