Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CITY OF OMAHA POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., 5:11-cv-04003-LHK. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20120810c48 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING(S) LUCY H. KOH, Judge. This Stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiffs the City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and City of Bristol Pension Fund ("Plaintiffs"), and defendants Juniper Networks, Inc. ("Juniper"), Scott G. Kriens, Kevin R. Johnson, and Robyn M. Denholm (the "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record. WHEREAS, on July 23, 2012,
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING(S)

LUCY H. KOH, Judge.

This Stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiffs the City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and City of Bristol Pension Fund ("Plaintiffs"), and defendants Juniper Networks, Inc. ("Juniper"), Scott G. Kriens, Kevin R. Johnson, and Robyn M. Denholm (the "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record.

WHEREAS, on July 23, 2012, the Court entered an order dismissing Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws without prejudice, providing that any Second Amended Complaint must be filed and served by Monday, August 13, 2012 (see ECF No. 84);

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs have been diligently working on the Second Amended Complaint to address the Court's concerns, but require one additional week due to a family medical emergency that the primary partner responsible for the action has been attending to;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested, and Defendants agreed, to allow Plaintiffs one additional week to file their Second Amended Complaint in light of this personal family medical emergency; and

WHEREAS, the parties agreed to allow Defendants to file their responsive pleading(s) on Monday, September 17, 2012, Plaintiffs until October 15, 2012 to file any opposition and Defendants until November 1, 2012 to file any reply in support of those responsive pleading(s);

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request the Court to order that:

1. Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Second Amended Complaint is extended through and including Monday, August 20, 2012;

2. Defendants' deadline to file their responsive pleading(s) is Monday, September 17, 2012;

3. Plaintiffs' deadline to file their opposition to any responsive pleading(s) is Monday, October 15, 2012; and

4. Defendants' deadline to file their responsive pleading(s) is Thursday, November 1, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Second Amended Complaint is hereby extended through and including Monday, August 20, 2012, and Defendants' deadline to file their responsive pleading(s) is Monday, September 17, 2012.

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, Mary K. Blasy, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading(s). I hereby attest that Steven Guggenheim has concurred in this filing.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 9, 2012, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I caused the foregoing document or paper to be mailed via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants indicated on the Manual Notice List.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer