U.S. v. ARMET ARMORED VEHICLES, INC., 4:12-cv-00045. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20141229508
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER JACKSON L. KISER, District Judge. Before me is Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim ("the Motion"). [ECF No. 62.] The matter was fully briefed by the parties, and counsel appeared in open court on December 4, 2014, to argue their respective position on the law and the facts. Having fully reviewed the pleadings and arguments of counsel, the matter is now ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memo
Summary: ORDER JACKSON L. KISER, District Judge. Before me is Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim ("the Motion"). [ECF No. 62.] The matter was fully briefed by the parties, and counsel appeared in open court on December 4, 2014, to argue their respective position on the law and the facts. Having fully reviewed the pleadings and arguments of counsel, the matter is now ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memor..
More
ORDER
JACKSON L. KISER, District Judge.
Before me is Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim ("the Motion"). [ECF No. 62.] The matter was fully briefed by the parties, and counsel appeared in open court on December 4, 2014, to argue their respective position on the law and the facts. Having fully reviewed the pleadings and arguments of counsel, the matter is now ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' Motion is hereby GRANTED with respect to Counts 9-10, 13-22, and 25. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Counts 1-8. Defendants did not move to dismiss Counts 11, 12, 23, or 24.
The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order and accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record.
Source: Leagle
