Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. NL INDUSTRIES, INC., 8:12-CV-0059. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20120323h42 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs' Motion to Enter Consent Decree (filing 4 ). The Court finds that the proposed consent decree (filing 2-1 ) was properly made available for public comment, see 77 Fed. Reg. 8900 (Feb. 15, 2012) , and that no comments were received. The Court further finds that the proposed consent decree is fair, reasonable, and consistent with the purposes that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
More

ORDER

JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs' Motion to Enter Consent Decree (filing 4). The Court finds that the proposed consent decree (filing 2-1) was properly made available for public comment, see 77 Fed. Reg. 8900 (Feb. 15, 2012), and that no comments were received. The Court further finds that the proposed consent decree is fair, reasonable, and consistent with the purposes that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., is intended to serve. See, U.S. v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist. (MSD), 952 F.2d 1040 (8th Cir. 1992); U.S. v. Cannons Engineering Corp., 899 F.2d 79 (1st Cir. 1990).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Motion to Enter Consent Decree (filing 4) is granted. 2. The fully-executed consent decree shall be filed separately. 3. Upon filing of the consent decree, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this matter for all statistical purposes.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer