Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Martinez-Paredes, CR 18-0541 JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181204849 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MATTER AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The parties appeared before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar on November 30, 2018, for an initial status conference. At the parties' joint request, the matter was continued to January 4, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. for change of plea. The government stated that it has produced the discovery in the case. Defense counsel is reviewing that discovery and will be unavailable for p
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MATTER AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The parties appeared before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar on November 30, 2018, for an initial status conference. At the parties' joint request, the matter was continued to January 4, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. for change of plea.

The government stated that it has produced the discovery in the case. Defense counsel is reviewing that discovery and will be unavailable for part of December. Therefore the parties stipulated, and the Court ordered, that time between November 30, 2018 and January 4, 2019, be excluded for effective preparation of counsel and continuity of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

The parties further stipulate, and ask the Court to find, that the requested continuance and exclusion of time are in the interests of justice and outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

SO STIPULATED.

For the reasons stated, this matter is continued until January 4, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. The time between November 30, 2018 and January 4, 2019, is excluded from the running of the speedy trial clock for effective preparation and continuity of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Failure to grant the continuance would deny the defendant's counsel the reasonable time necessary to prepare and deny defendant continuity of counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Attestation of Filer

In addition to myself, the other signatory to this document is David Rizk. I attest that I have his permission to enter a conformed signature on his behalf and to file the document.

Dated: November 30, 2018. /s/ ___________________________ KATHERINE L. WAWRZYNIAK Assistant United States Attorney
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer