SHERMAN v. KLENKE, 11-cv-03091-PAB-CBS. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20151103561
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , District Judge . Plaintiff has filed pro se a "Motion to Continue Indigency Status for Purposes of Appeal" [Docket No. 179]. The motion is deficient for the following reasons: X is missing affidavit ___ affidavit is incomplete ___ affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized ___ affidavit is missing required financial information ___ is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding this fil
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , District Judge . Plaintiff has filed pro se a "Motion to Continue Indigency Status for Purposes of Appeal" [Docket No. 179]. The motion is deficient for the following reasons: X is missing affidavit ___ affidavit is incomplete ___ affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized ___ affidavit is missing required financial information ___ is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding this fili..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed pro se a "Motion to Continue Indigency Status for Purposes of Appeal" [Docket No. 179]. The motion is deficient for the following reasons:
X is missing affidavit
___ affidavit is incomplete
___ affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized
___ affidavit is missing required financial information
___ is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding this filing
___ is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
___ is missing an original signature by the prisoner
X is not on proper form (must use the court's current form)
X other authorization to calculate/disburse filing fee payments is missing
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion to Continue Indigency Status for Purposes of Appeal [Docket No. 179] is denied without prejudice because the motion is deficient. A new motion may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is further
ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
