U.S. v. Takata Corporation, 17-mc-50300. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180216a71
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER STRIKING OLEG YARIN'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (Doc. 21) GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Now before the court is Oleg Yarin's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Yarin filed a prior motion seeking the same relief on October 2, 2017, (Doc. 17) which this court denied on the basis that there was no good faith basis for the appeal. (Doc. 18). Yarin then filed a motion for reconsideration, (Doc. 19), which this court also denied. (Doc. 20). Ya
Summary: ORDER STRIKING OLEG YARIN'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (Doc. 21) GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Now before the court is Oleg Yarin's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Yarin filed a prior motion seeking the same relief on October 2, 2017, (Doc. 17) which this court denied on the basis that there was no good faith basis for the appeal. (Doc. 18). Yarin then filed a motion for reconsideration, (Doc. 19), which this court also denied. (Doc. 20). Yar..
More
ORDER STRIKING OLEG YARIN'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (Doc. 21)
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Now before the court is Oleg Yarin's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Yarin filed a prior motion seeking the same relief on October 2, 2017, (Doc. 17) which this court denied on the basis that there was no good faith basis for the appeal. (Doc. 18). Yarin then filed a motion for reconsideration, (Doc. 19), which this court also denied. (Doc. 20). Yarin is asking the court to revisit the issue it has twice decided. There is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules which allows a litigant, even a pro se litigant, to refile the same request three times. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to STRIKE Document 21 as improvidently filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
