Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Mega Mechanical Systems Corp., 1:17cv0737 (AJT/JFA). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Virginia Number: infdco20171021o24 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2017
Summary: PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN F. ANDERSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for default judgment pursuant to federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (Docket no. 11). Plaintiffs arc the Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund ("National Pension Fund") and the Trustees or the International Training fund ("International Training Fund"). Each plaintiff seeks a default judgment against the defendant Mega Mech
More

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for default judgment pursuant to federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (Docket no. 11). Plaintiffs arc the Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund ("National Pension Fund") and the Trustees or the International Training fund ("International Training Fund"). Each plaintiff seeks a default judgment against the defendant Mega Mechanical Systems Corp. ("Mega"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned magistrate judge is filing with the court his proposed findings of fact and recommendations, a copy of which will be provided to all parties.

Procedural Background

On June 28, 2017, the plaintiffs filed this action alleging that Mega breached a Collective Bargaining Agreement with the United Association Local Union No. 777 and seeking an award for past due contributions, liquidated damages, interest, attorney's fees and costs, and for injunctive relief. (Docket no. 1). A summons for the complaint was issued on June 28, 2017 (Docket no. 3), and the summons and complaint were served on Mega on July 7, 2017 (Docket no. 4). In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), a responsive pleading was due on July 28, 2017, 21 days after service of the summons and complaint. The defendant failed to file a responsive pleading in a timely manner. On August 17, 2017, the plaintiffs filed their request for entry of default. (Docket no. 7). The Clerk of Court entered default against the defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) on August 18, 2017. (Docket no. 9).

On August 30, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment, a memorandum in support of the motion for default judgment, and a notice setting a hearing for September 22, 2017. (Docket nos. 11-13). The motion for default judgment was supported with two affidavits from Toni C. Inscoe and a declaration by John R. Harney. (Docket no. 12). The motion for default judgment and supporting papers were served on the defendant by mail on August 30, 2017. (Docket nos. 11-13). On September 19, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended memorandum in support of motion for default judgment including two affidavits from Eric Boyce amending the affidavits previously submitted by Toni Inscoe. (Docket no. 14). The amended memorandum was served on the defendant on September 19, 2017. (Id.). On September 22, 2017, counsel for the plaintiffs appeared at the hearing on the motion for default judgment and no one appeared on behalf of the defendant.

Factual Background

The following facts are established by complaint (Docket no. 1) ("Compl.") and the affidavits and declaration attached as exhibits to the memorandum in support of the motion for default judgment and the amended memorandum (Docket nos. 12, 14). The Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and the Trustees of the International Training Fund are trustees of multi-employer employee benefit plans as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(3) and (37). (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 2). The National Pension Fund is established and maintained by a Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust and by a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the United Association Local Union No. 777 and the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 1). The International Training Fund is established and maintained by a Restated Trust Agreement and by a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the United Association Local Union No. 777 and the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 2). The National Pension Fund and the International Training Fund are administered in Alexandria, Virginia. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 2). Mega is a Connecticut corporation with an office located in Glastonbury, Connecticut. (Compl. ¶ 3). At all times herein, Mega was an "employer in an industry affecting commerce" as defined by 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(5), (9), (11), (12) and (14); 29 U.S.C. §§ 142(1), (3) and 152(2); and 29 U.S.C. § 1001(a). (Compl. ¶ 3).

Plaintiffs bring this action under Sections 502 and 515 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 and 1145, and under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). (Compl. ¶ 4). Defendant is a signatory to the Collective Bargaining Agreement with United Association Local Union No. 777 establishing the terms and conditions of employment for journeymen and apprentice plumbers and pipefitters employed by the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 5). Pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, the defendant agreed to pay the National Pension Fund and the International Training Fund certain sums of money for each hour worked by employees of the defendant covered by the Collective Bargaining Agreement. (Compl. ¶¶ 6, 7). Plaintiffs claim that the defendant employed certain employees covered under the Collective Bargaining Agreement and failed to make proper contributions to the National Pension Fund (Count I) and the International Training Fund (Count II) for work performed at the defendant's request. (Compl. ¶¶ 8, 9, 20).

Count I — National Pension Fund

In the complaint the National Pension Fund asserts that the defendant failed to pay the amounts owed for contributions for the months of March 2017 through May 2017. (Compl. ¶ 9). The National Pension Fund alleges that the defendant failed to make contributions in the amount of $25,184.81 for the months of March 2017 and April 2017 pursuant to reports submitted by the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 10). The National Pension Fund also alleges that the defendant failed to submit a report indicating the amount owed for May 2017 and pursuant to terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and the Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust, the projected delinquency for May 1017 was $11,607.70. (Compl. ¶¶ 11-15). The National Pension Fund also alleges that the defendant is bound to the Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust that provides in Article VI, Section 5 that an employer who fails to pay the amounts required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement on time shall be considered delinquent and may be assessed liquidated damages in the amount of 10% of the amount due if payment is not received by the due date. (Compl. ¶ 17). Furthermore, pursuant to the Restated Trust Agreement, interest is assessed at a rate of 12% per annum from the date the payment was due through the date of payment to the National Pension Fund. (Docket no. 14-2, Boyce Affid. ¶ 10). Since the filing of this action, Mega has paid the contributions owed to the National Pension Fund for March 2017 through May 2017 in the amount of $44,194.50. (Docket no. 14-2). As set forth in the amended memorandum, the National Pension Fund now seeks an award for liquated damages and accrued interest given that the contribution payments for March 2017 through May 2017 were not made in a timely manner, along with the attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Docket no. 14).

Count II — International Training Fund

In the complaint, the International Training Fund alleges that the defendant failed to make contributions to the International Training Fund for the months of March 2017 through May 2017. (Compl. ¶ 20). The International Training Fund alleges that the defendant failed to make contributions in the amount of $659.80 for the months of March 2017 and April 2017 pursuant to reports submitted by the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 21). The International Training Fund also alleges that the defendant failed to submit a report indicating the amount owed for the month of May 2017 and pursuant to terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and the Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust, the projected delinquency for May 2017 was $300.22. (Compl. ¶¶ 22-26). The International Training Fund also alleges that the defendant is bound to the Restated Trust Agreement that provides in Article VI, Section 6 that if an employer fails to file a report or make contributions within ten calendar days of the due date, the Trustees have the discretion to add liquidated damages in the amount of 20% of the amount due for each monthly report or payment past due to the amount owed by the employer. (Compl. ¶ 28). Pursuant to the Restated Trust Agreement, interest is assessed at a rate of 12% per annum from the due date through the date of payment to the International Training Fund. (Docket no. 14-3, Boyce Affid. ¶ 10). Since the filing of this action, Mega has paid the contributions owed to the International Training Fund for March 2017 through May 2017 in the amount of $1,171.78. (Docket no. 14-3). As set forth in the amended memorandum, the International Training Fund now seeks an award for liquated damages and accrued interest given that the contribution payments for March 2017 through May 2017 were not made in a timely manner. (Docket no. 14).

Plaintiffs assert that pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), they are entitled to a judgment awarding: (1) liquidated damages; (2) interest; and (3) reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action.1

Proposed Findings and Recommendations

Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for the entry of a default judgment when "a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend." The court must have both subject matter and personal jurisdiction over a defaulting party before it can render a default judgment.

A defendant in default admits the factual allegations in the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6) ("An allegation — other than one relating to the amount of damages — is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied."); see also GlobalSantaFe Corp. v. Globalsantafe.com, 250 F.Supp.2d 610, 612 n.3 (E.D. Va. 2003) ("Upon default, facts alleged in the complaint are deemed admitted and the appropriate inquiry is whether the facts as alleged state a claim."). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) provides that a court may conduct a hearing to determine the amount of damages, establish the truth of any allegation by evidence, or investigate any other matter.

Jurisdiction and Venue

Plaintiffs allege that this court has subject matter jurisdiction under Sections 502 and 515 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 and 1145, and under Section 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). ERISA Section 502 provides that U.S. district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions brought under this title. ERISA Section 515 states that employers bound by collective bargaining agreements or multi-employer plans shall make contributions in accordance with the terms of the plans or agreements. LMRA Section 301 provides jurisdiction in the U.S. district courts for suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization. This case is properly before the court under its federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e).

ERISA Section 502 states that an action under this title may be brought in the "district where the plan is administered" and "process may be served in any other district where a defendant resides or may be found." 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2). Each plaintiff states that it is administered in Alexandria. Virginia. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 2). On July 7, 2017, the summons and complaint were served in person on Richard Kuzmak, the registered agent for Mega. (Docket no. 4). Venue is proper in this court and this court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant because each plaintiff fund is administered within the Alexandria Division of the Eastern District of Virginia and the defendant was served properly. See Bd. of Trs., Sheet Metal Workers' Nat'l Pension Fund v. McD Metals, Inc., 964 F.Supp. 1040 (E.D. Va. 1997) (personal jurisdiction in an ERISA action should be determined on the basis of the defendant's national contacts with the United States pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and ERISA itself provides for nationwide service of process).

For these reasons, the undersigned magistrate judge recommends a finding that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, that the court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and that venue is proper in this court.

Grounds for Entry of Default

The complaint was served on Mega on July 7, 2017. (Docket no. 4). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), a responsive pleading was due on July 28, 2017. After the defendant failed to file an answer or responsive pleading in a timely manner, the plaintiffs requested an entry of default on August 17, 2017. (Docket no. 7). The Clerk of Court entered a default on August 18, 2017. (Docket no. 9).

The undersigned magistrate judge recommends a finding that the defendant was served properly, that it failed to file a responsive pleading in a timely manner, and that the Clerk of Court properly entered a default as to the defendant.

Liability and Measure of Damages

According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(c), a default judgment "must not differ in kind from, or exceed in amount, what is demanded in the pleadings." Because the defendant did not file a responsive pleading and is in default, the defendant admits the factual allegations in the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6). As set forth in the affidavits in support of the motion for default judgment, subsequent to the filing of the complaint the defendant remitted the delinquent reports and paid the contributions that were owed for those months. (Docket nos. 14-2 and 14-3). While the defendant has now paid the contributions owed for the months of March 2017 through May 2017 to the National Pension Fund and to the International Training Fund, those payments were not made in a timely manner and were made after the plaintiffs filed this action. ERISA Section 515 provides that in any action brought to enforce the payment of delinquent contributions in which a judgment in favor of the plan is awarded, the court shall award the plan:

(A) the unpaid contributions, (B) interest on the unpaid contributions, (C) an amount equal to the greater of — (i) interest on the unpaid contributions, or (ii) liquidated damages provided for under the plan in an amount not in excess of 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under Federal or State law) of the amount determined by the court under subparagraph (A), (D) reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant, and (E) such other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.

29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2).

In support of its current claim for damages, the National Pension Fund submitted an affidavit of Eric Boyce with the amended memorandum. (Docket no. 14-2). The International Training Fund also submitted an affidavit of Eric Boyce with amended memorandum. (Docket no. 14-3). In addition to the affidavits from Mr. Boyce, the National Pension Fund submitted a declaration from John R. Harney detailing the attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Docket no. 12-3).

The information contained in the affidavit of Eric Boyce submitted on behalf of the National Pension Fund establishes that the National Pension Fund is owed liquidated damages in the amount of $4,419.45 (calculated at 10% of the contributions found to be paid late) and interest at the rate of 12% from the date the payments were due through the date they were paid, totaling $1,185.58. In addition, the Harney declaration details the fees and costs incurred on behalf of the National Pension Fund in this matter. As shown in the attachment to the Harney declaration, the total amount of fees requested is $1,845.00 for 10.5 hours of attorney and paralegal time and the amount of costs requested is $638.79 for the filing fee, process server fee, and computerized research. The undersigned has reviewed the Harney declaration and the supporting documentation and recommends that the court find that the $1,845.00 requested for fees and the $638.79 requested for costs by the National Pension Fund are reasonable and should be paid by the defendant.2

For these reasons, the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of the National Pension Fund against the defendant in the amounts shown below.

Liquidated Damages $4,419.45 Accrued Interest $1,185.58 Attorney's Fees $1,845.00 Costs $638.79 Total $8,088.82

The information contained in the affidavit of Mr. Boyce submitted on behalf of the International Training Fund establishes that the International Training Fund is owed liquidated damages in the amount of $234.36 (calculated at 20% of the contributions found to be paid late) and interest at the rate of 12% from the date the payments were due until paid totaling $31.38.

For these reasons, the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of the International Training Fund against the defendant in the amounts shown below.

Liquidated Damages $234.36 Accrued Interest $31.38 Total $265.74

For the reasons stated above, the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of the Trustees of the National Pension Fund against the defendant on Count I of the complaint in the amount of $8,088.82 and that a default judgment be entered in favor of the Trustees of the International Training Fund against the defendant on Count II of the complaint in the amount of $265.74.

Notice

By means of the court's electronic filing system and by mailing a copy of this proposed findings of fact and recommendations to Mega Mechanical Systems Corp., 98 Commerce Street, Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 and to Richard Kuzmak, Registered Agent, Mega Mechanical Systems Corp., 801 Maple Avenue, Hartford, Connecticut 06114, the parties arc notified that objections to this proposed findings of fact and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days of service of this proposed findings of fact and recommendations and a failure to file timely objections waives appellate review of the substance of the proposed findings of fact and recommendations and waives appellate review of any judgment or decision based on this proposed findings of fact and recommendations.

FootNotes


1. In Count III plaintiffs seek an order enjoining the violations of the terms of the employee benefit plans and requiring the defendant to submit timely contributions and remittance reports to each plaintiff. Plaintiffs have not pursued their request for injunctive relief in the motion for default judgment.
2. The Harney declaration does not comply fully with the standards set forth in Grissom v. The Mills Corp., 549 F.3d 313, 320-23 (4th Cir. 2008), Barber v. Kimbrell's Inc., 577 F.2d 216, 226 (4th Cir. 1978), and Plyler v. Evatt, 902 F.2d 273, 277 (4th Cir. 1990) for establishing a reasonable fee award. However, because the defendant has not contested the requested amount of fees in this case, the court will accept the allegations set forth by the National Pension Fund concerning the reasonableness of these fees as true. The amount of the fees and costs requested are consistent with fees and costs incurred and awarded by this court in similar cases.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer