IN RE PFIZER INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 04 Civ. 9866 (LTS)(HBP). (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20140523a61
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 21, 2014
Latest Update: May 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 9, which seeks the preclusion of "evidence or argument relating to affirmative defenses that were not asserted in Defendants' answer," is granted to the extent that Defendants' Answer is not to be construed to assert any affirmative defense not specifically plead therein. This order does not preclude motion practice seeking leave to amend pleadings, nor does it preclude any arguments in opposition to such motion practic
Summary: ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 9, which seeks the preclusion of "evidence or argument relating to affirmative defenses that were not asserted in Defendants' answer," is granted to the extent that Defendants' Answer is not to be construed to assert any affirmative defense not specifically plead therein. This order does not preclude motion practice seeking leave to amend pleadings, nor does it preclude any arguments in opposition to such motion practice..
More
ORDER
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 9, which seeks the preclusion of "evidence or argument relating to affirmative defenses that were not asserted in Defendants' answer," is granted to the extent that Defendants' Answer is not to be construed to assert any affirmative defense not specifically plead therein. This order does not preclude motion practice seeking leave to amend pleadings, nor does it preclude any arguments in opposition to such motion practice or arguments with respect to the admissibility of particular evidence.
This Order resolves docket entry no. 560.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
