Sperling v. Stein Mart, Inc., 5:15-cv-01411-AB-KK. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180326583
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Defendant Stein Mart Inc. ("Stein Mart") has moved for summary judgment in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking to dismiss with prejudice this case in its entirety. After fully considering the arguments and evidence presented, this Court granted Stein Mart's motion on February 23, 2018 [ see Docket Entry No. 114]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT summary judgment is h
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Defendant Stein Mart Inc. ("Stein Mart") has moved for summary judgment in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking to dismiss with prejudice this case in its entirety. After fully considering the arguments and evidence presented, this Court granted Stein Mart's motion on February 23, 2018 [ see Docket Entry No. 114]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT summary judgment is he..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Defendant Stein Mart Inc. ("Stein Mart") has moved for summary judgment in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking to dismiss with prejudice this case in its entirety. After fully considering the arguments and evidence presented, this Court granted Stein Mart's motion on February 23, 2018 [see Docket Entry No. 114].
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT summary judgment is hereby entered in favor of Stein Mart on all counts, that Plaintiffs Marilyn Sperling and Jerred Schuh shall take nothing by this action, and that Plaintiffs' case shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in this Court's February 23, 2018 order, which was entered on February 26, 2018.
Source: Leagle
