NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On December 15, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF No. 43.) Petitioner requests attorneys' fees in the amount of $15,837.80 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $1,105.09
On December 20, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion. (ECF No. 44.) Respondent argues that "[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an award of attorneys' fees and costs." (Id. at 1.) Respondent adds, however, that he "is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs are met in this case." (Id. at 2.) Respondent "respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys' fees and costs." (Id. at 3.)
On December 27, 2017, petitioner filed a reply. (ECF No. 45.) Petitioner disputes respondent's position that she has no role in resolving attorneys' fees and costs and further reiterates her view that her attorneys' fees and costs in this case are reasonable.
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request. In the undersigned's experience, the request appears reasonable, and the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours with the exceptions listed below.
Ms. Wilson billed 6.50 hours in 2016 at a rate of $301 per hour, and 33.50 hours in 2017 at a rate of $308 per hour. (ECF No. 43-1, p. 11.) The undersigned reduces Ms. Wilson's hourly rates to $275 for 2016, and $290 for 2017. See Kaufman v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 15-1045V, 2016 WL 8347656, at *4-5 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 7, 2016) (setting Ms. Wilson's rate for 2014 through 2016); Noblett v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 14-969V, 2017 WL 3033932, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 15, 2017) (setting a 2017 rate for Ms. Wilson based in part on the undersigned's analysis in Kaufman).
Additionally, on March 22, 2017, Ms. Wilson billed 7.0 hours of travel at her full hourly rate. (ECF No. 43-1, p. 5.) In the Vaccine Program, special masters traditionally have compensated time spent traveling when no other work was being performed at one-half an attorney's hourly rate. See Hocraffer v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 99-533V, 2011 WL 3705153, at *24 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. July 25, 2011); Rodriguez v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 06-559V, 2009 WL 2568468, at *21 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jul. 27, 2009); English v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 01-61V, 2006 WL 3419805, at *12-13 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 9, 2006). However, special masters should not use this rule as standard practice but rather "[e]ach case should be assessed on its own merits." Gruber v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 91 Fed. Cl. 773, 791 (2010). "Even an automatic 50% award may be too high for an undocumented claim, given the possibility that an attorney may use the travel time to work on another matter or not to work at all while traveling." Id. The undersigned finds this time should have been billed at an hourly rate of $145.00, one-half of the usual 2017 rate for petitioner's counsel.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.