Segura v. Johnson, B-13-205 (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160322e61
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER ANDREW S. HANEN , District Judge . On February 23, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation. [Doc. No. 55] Plaintiff has objected to said Report and Recommendation. [Doc. No. 56] Having considered de novo the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the issues raised by Plaintiff's objections, the Court orders that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is gran
Summary: ORDER ANDREW S. HANEN , District Judge . On February 23, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation. [Doc. No. 55] Plaintiff has objected to said Report and Recommendation. [Doc. No. 56] Having considered de novo the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the issues raised by Plaintiff's objections, the Court orders that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is grant..
More
ORDER
ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge.
On February 23, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation. [Doc. No. 55] Plaintiff has objected to said Report and Recommendation. [Doc. No. 56]
Having considered de novo the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the issues raised by Plaintiff's objections, the Court orders that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. [Doc. No. 32].
Source: Leagle
