Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomann v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1162V. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20191227752 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . On August 9, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on September 18, 2012. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office o
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On August 9, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on September 18, 2012. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 22, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On November 6, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $65,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump sum payment of $65,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Mark Thomann. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On July 18, 2019, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report, in which he conceded that petitioner sustained the onset of Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, following his receipt of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on September 18, 2012. Docket No. 23. On July 22, 2019, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation. . Docket No. 25.

I. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $65,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $65,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.

FootNotes


1. I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer