Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCrea v. United States, 19-460. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20190925847 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER LOREN A. SMITH , Senior Judge . On March 18, 2019, Sharon McCrea, a pro se plaintiff, filed her Complaint with this Court, and, on May 17, 2019, filed an amended complaint. On July 16, 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). After Plaintiff failed to timely respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, on August 22, 2019, the Court issued an Order giving plaintiff an additional 21 days to f
More

ORDER

On March 18, 2019, Sharon McCrea, a pro se plaintiff, filed her Complaint with this Court, and, on May 17, 2019, filed an amended complaint. On July 16, 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). After Plaintiff failed to timely respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, on August 22, 2019, the Court issued an Order giving plaintiff an additional 21 days to file her Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. See ECF No. 14. In that Order, the Court warned that if plaintiff failed to file her Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before the extended deadline—September 11, 2019—plaintiff's Complaint would be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under RCFC 41(b). Id.

To date, the Court has not received plaintiff's Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. As such, the Court has no choice but to DISMISS plaintiff's case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to RCFC 41(b). The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer