Filed: Sep. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On May 12, 2016, Lincoln and Daswattie John ("petitioners"), as the parents and natural guardians of their minor son, K.J., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners allege that that K.J. suffered Guillain-Barr syndrome ("GBS") as a result of the following vaccines administered to him on May 12,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On May 12, 2016, Lincoln and Daswattie John ("petitioners"), as the parents and natural guardians of their minor son, K.J., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners allege that that K.J. suffered Guillain-Barr syndrome ("GBS") as a result of the following vaccines administered to him on May 12, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On May 12, 2016, Lincoln and Daswattie John ("petitioners"), as the parents and natural guardians of their minor son, K.J., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners allege that that K.J. suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome ("GBS") as a result of the following vaccines administered to him on May 12, 2014: influenza (flu) vaccine, varicella vaccine, and/or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine; and/or as a result of the following vaccines administered to him on June 12, 2014: hepatitis A (Hep A) vaccine; diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (Dtap) vaccine, haemophilus influenza type B (HIB) vaccine, and pneumococcal conjugate (Prevnar) vaccine. Petition at ¶¶ 1-23. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On September 22, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he states that he does not contest that petitioners are entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that "petitioners have satisfied the criteria set forth in the newly revised Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation." Id. at 4 (internal citations omitted). Respondent further states that although the revised Vaccine Injury Table only governs petitions filed on or after the effective date of the final rule, the evidence shows that K.J. suffered GBS following the administration of a seasonal flu vaccine, and that the onset occurred within the time period specified in the Table. Id. at 4-5. Recognizing that petitioners may re-file this petition and be afforded a presumption of causation under the revised Table, respondent will not contest entitlement to compensation in this case. Id.
In view of respondent's position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioners are entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
