Filed: Jun. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2018
Summary: Not to be Published RULING FINDING ENTITLEMENT 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Special Master . On September 11, 2017, James Parlette filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Guillain-Barr syndrome ("GBS") as a result of receiving the influenza ("flu") vaccination on September 18, 2014. Id. In his Rule 4(c) Report, Respondent acknowledged that the Petitioner's claim is compensable as a T
Summary: Not to be Published RULING FINDING ENTITLEMENT 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Special Master . On September 11, 2017, James Parlette filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Guillain-Barr syndrome ("GBS") as a result of receiving the influenza ("flu") vaccination on September 18, 2014. Id. In his Rule 4(c) Report, Respondent acknowledged that the Petitioner's claim is compensable as a Ta..
More
Not to be Published
RULING FINDING ENTITLEMENT1
BRIAN H. CORCORAN, Special Master.
On September 11, 2017, James Parlette filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome ("GBS") as a result of receiving the influenza ("flu") vaccination on September 18, 2014. Id.
In his Rule 4(c) Report, Respondent acknowledged that the Petitioner's claim is compensable as a Table injury under the Act. See Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report, dated June 14, 2018 (ECF No. 34). Respondent specifically stated that medical personnel at the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services, have reviewed the petition and accompanying documents filed in this case, as well as the relevant medical records, and Respondent has concluded that Petitioner satisfied the criteria set forth in the Table. Id. at 8. Respondent concedes that the evidence shows that Petitioner suffered from GBS as a result of the flu vaccine, and that onset occurred within the appropriate timeframe. Id. Respondent therefore concludes that Petitioner is entitled to an award of damages. Id.
In view of Respondent's concession, and based on my own review of the record (see § 300aa-13(a)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a)(I)), I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation for an injury that was caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine. 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a)(XIV), 100.3(b)(2). A separate damages order will be issued shortly.
Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Cate Rodgers, at (202) 357-6345.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
