Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 3:10-md-2143 RS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130606951 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL (DOCKET NOS. 877, 880, 881 AND 895) RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on May 29, 2013, plaintiffs' counsel filed three administrative motions to file materials under seal, as Docket Nos. 877, 880, and 881; WHEREAS, on June 3, 2013, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed an additional administrative motion to file materials under seal, as Docket No. 895; WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL (DOCKET NOS. 877, 880, 881 AND 895)

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on May 29, 2013, plaintiffs' counsel filed three administrative motions to file materials under seal, as Docket Nos. 877, 880, and 881;

WHEREAS, on June 3, 2013, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed an additional administrative motion to file materials under seal, as Docket No. 895;

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), the deadline for filing declarations and materials in response to these administrative motions to seal is currently June 5, 2013 (as to Docket Nos. 877, 880 and 881) and June 10, 2013 (as to Docket No. 895);

WHEREAS, the administrative motion to seal filed by the direct purchaser plaintiffs (Docket No. 877) covers more than 200 exhibits submitted with the class certification motion, plus portions of the other filings made in connection with their motion for class certification;

WHEREAS, the administrative motion to seal filed by the indirect purchaser plaintiffs in connection with their motion for class certification (Docket No. 881) covers 87 exhibits, some of which include multiple documents produced by the defendants, plus portions of the other filings made in connection with their motion for class certification;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed under seal the expert report and expert declaration in support of their respective class certification motions, with accompanying exhibits;

WHEREAS, defendants' counsel require additional time to fully evaluate and respond to plaintiffs' administrative motions to seal, and to coordinate among defendants with respect to materials compiling or containing information produced by different defendants; and

WHEREAS, plaintiffs' counsel have no objection to providing additional time to respond to those administrative motions;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:

The deadline for filing declarations and any other materials in response to the administrative motions to seal filed as Docket Nos. 877, 880, 881 and 895 shall be extended to

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer