Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Korean Ramen Antitrust Litigation, 3:13-cv-04115-WHO-DMR. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160503a94 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING ISSUANCE OF REVISED LETTERS ROGATORY [Proposed] ORDER DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ("Plaintiffs") in the above-captioned consolidated action (the "Action"), and Defendants Nongshim Co. Ltd. Nongshim America, Inc., Ottogi Co. Ltd. and Ottogi America Inc. ("Defendants") by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: Recitals 1. WHEREAS, in a letter dated April 11, 2016, the National Court Administrati
More

STIPULATION REGARDING ISSUANCE OF REVISED LETTERS ROGATORY [Proposed] ORDER

The Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ("Plaintiffs") in the above-captioned consolidated action (the "Action"), and Defendants Nongshim Co. Ltd. Nongshim America, Inc., Ottogi Co. Ltd. and Ottogi America Inc. ("Defendants") by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

Recitals

1. WHEREAS, in a letter dated April 11, 2016, the National Court Administration, Republic of Korea, stated that it was declining to serve the letters rogatory for certain procedural defects, but stated that it would allow revised letters rogatory that cured the defects.

2. WHEREAS on April 21, 2016, this Court issued an order stating that "If the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (`DPPs') wish to submit amended Letters Rogatory, they should file redacted versions of the revised Letters Rogatory, the stipulation with the parties' agreement to issuance of the revised Letters Rogatory and approval of the revised Letters Rogatory as to Form, and should provide the court with all required materials, including the certified Korean translations, for the revised Letters Rogatory by April 28, 2016."

3. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs seek Letters Rogatory as to two former Samyang Foods Co. Ltd. employees (the "Revised Letters Rogatory").

4. WHEREAS, on April 28, 2016, Plaintiffs submitted a letter to the Court requesting an extension until May 13, 2016 to file the Revised Letters Rogatory, and noted that Defendants did not object to this Extension.

5. WHEREAS, on April 29, 2016, this Court directed Plaintiffs to submit a stipulation and proposed order with the request.

Stipulation

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs request that this Court extend the deadline to file Revised Letters Rogatory until May 13, 2016.

2. Defendants do not object to Plaintiffs' request as stated herein.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline to file the Revised Letters Rogatory shall be extended until May 13, 2016. The DPPs shall provide the court with all required materials to be sent to the National Court Administration for the Republic of Korea by May 13, 2016. The parties remain responsible for complying with all procedural and substantive requirements associate with the Letters Rogatory.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer