STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Electrograph Systems, Inc.; Electrograph Technologies, Corp.; Alfred H. Siegel (as trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust); Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; BestBuy.com, L.L.C.; Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.; Interbond Corporation of America; Office Depot, Inc.; Costco Wholesale Corporation; P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation; ABC Appliance, Inc.; MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc.; Schultze Agency Services, LLC, (on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC, and Tweeter Newco, LLC); Sears Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp.; and Target Corp., (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc., and Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc., (collectively "Defendants"), have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject to the Court's approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have filed complaints asserting claims under federal and various states' laws against the Defendants based on an alleged conspiracy to fix the prices of CRTs from March 1, 1995 to November 25, 2007;

WHEREAS, on December 30, 2013, Defendants filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss") [Dkt. No. 2299] the undersigned Plaintiffs' complaints;

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3 requires the Plaintiffs to respond to the Motion to Dismiss no later than January 13, 2014 and requires Defendants to file any reply no later than January 20, 2014;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to an extension of time regarding the Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and Defendants' Reply to that Motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendants as follows:

SCHEDULE

The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall be submitted on papers.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.