Filed: Jul. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW , this ____ day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Relator's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 59, 60. 72), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 63, 64, 65, 66, 75), Relator's Motion to Exclude Joseph Groeger (Docket Nos. 61, 62, 73), Defendant's Motion to Exclude David Bahr (Docket Nos. 67, 68), Defendant's Motion to Exclude Gary Poleskey (Docket Nos. 69, 70) and the Responses and Replies thereto (Docket Nos. 77-8
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW , this ____ day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Relator's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 59, 60. 72), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 63, 64, 65, 66, 75), Relator's Motion to Exclude Joseph Groeger (Docket Nos. 61, 62, 73), Defendant's Motion to Exclude David Bahr (Docket Nos. 67, 68), Defendant's Motion to Exclude Gary Poleskey (Docket Nos. 69, 70) and the Responses and Replies thereto (Docket Nos. 77-87..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this ____ day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Relator's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 59, 60. 72), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 63, 64, 65, 66, 75), Relator's Motion to Exclude Joseph Groeger (Docket Nos. 61, 62, 73), Defendant's Motion to Exclude David Bahr (Docket Nos. 67, 68), Defendant's Motion to Exclude Gary Poleskey (Docket Nos. 69, 70) and the Responses and Replies thereto (Docket Nos. 77-87, 89-91), and following oral argument on July 2, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Relator's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 59, 60. 72) is DENIED;
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 63, 64, 65, 66, 75) is DENIED;
3. Relator's Motion to Exclude Joseph Groeger (Docket Nos. 61, 62, 73) is DENIED;
4. Defendant's Motion to Exclude David Bahr (Docket Nos. 67, 68) is DENIED; and
5. Defendant's Motion to Exclude Gary Poleskey (Docket Nos. 69, 70) is DENIED.
