Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Salcedo, 2:15-CR-0208 JAM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151116964 Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendants, Carlos Jairo Gallardo Salcedo and Salvador Estrella Naranjo, that the status conference scheduled for November 17, 2015, may be continued to January 12, 2016, at 9:15 a.m. The government provided discovery to defense counsel last week. There is extensive audio and video evidence to review. Cou
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

It is hereby stipulated and agreed between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendants, Carlos Jairo Gallardo Salcedo and Salvador Estrella Naranjo, that the status conference scheduled for November 17, 2015, may be continued to January 12, 2016, at 9:15 a.m.

The government provided discovery to defense counsel last week. There is extensive audio and video evidence to review. Counsel need additional time to review discovery and to determine whether investigation is warranted before the case is further scheduled. The parties therefore agree that the status conference should be continued to January 12, 2016, and ask the Court to order time excluded under the Speedy Trial Act through that date in order to afford necessary time for effective preparation. The parties agree that the interests of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of Mr. Salcedo, Mr. Naranjo, and the public in a speedy trial, and ask the Court to order time excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (b)(iv).

BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney Dated: November 12, 2015. /s/ T. Zindel for C. Highsmith CHRISTIAAN HIGHSMITH Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to January 12, 2016, at 9:15 a.m. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial for the reasons stated above. Time is therefore excluded from the date of this order through January 12, 2016, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer