Esparza v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 1:19-cv-0485-LJO-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190502e05
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 4) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On April 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed "to the dismissal of this action with prejudice." (Doc. 4at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it "a
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 4) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On April 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed "to the dismissal of this action with prejudice." (Doc. 4at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it "au..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION
(Doc. 4)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On April 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed "to the dismissal of this action with prejudice." (Doc. 4at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
