Jack v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd., 2:17-cv-00537 JLR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180604527
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 24, 2018
Latest Update: May 24, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT THE NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY JAMES L. ROBART , Judge . STIPULATION Defendant The Nash Engineering Company and Plaintiffs Leslie Jack, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patrick Jack, and David Jack, individually, hereby stipulate that all claims herein brought against The Nash Engineering Company may be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party, reserving to Plaintiffs all rights of a
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT THE NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY JAMES L. ROBART , Judge . STIPULATION Defendant The Nash Engineering Company and Plaintiffs Leslie Jack, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patrick Jack, and David Jack, individually, hereby stipulate that all claims herein brought against The Nash Engineering Company may be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party, reserving to Plaintiffs all rights of ac..
More
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT THE NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY
JAMES L. ROBART, Judge.
STIPULATION
Defendant The Nash Engineering Company and Plaintiffs Leslie Jack, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patrick Jack, and David Jack, individually, hereby stipulate that all claims herein brought against The Nash Engineering Company may be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party, reserving to Plaintiffs all rights of action, claims, and demands against any and all other parties. Plaintiffs and The Nash Engineering Company further stipulate to the entry of the following Order of Dismissal without further Notice.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS MATTER having come on regularly for hearing before this Court upon the foregoing Stipulation, and the Court being fully advised in the premises.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' claims against defendant The Nash Engineering Company are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice and without costs to either party, reserving to Plaintiffs all of Plaintiffs' rights of action, claims and demands against any and all other parties. The pending motion for summary judgment filed by The Nash Engineering Company is denied as moot (Dkt. #360).
Source: Leagle
