Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SWAMY v. TITLE SOURCE, INC., C 17-1175 WHA. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170510991 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 09, 2017
Latest Update: May 09, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF ATTORNEYS GALVIN B. KENNEDY, MARSHALL M. HOGG, AND JEFFREY B. MORGANROTH WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Galvin B. Kennedy, Marshall M. Hogg, and Jeffrey B. Morganroth (Dkt. Nos. 18, 19, 22) are DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highes
More

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF ATTORNEYS GALVIN B. KENNEDY, MARSHALL M. HOGG, AND JEFFREY B. MORGANROTH

The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Galvin B. Kennedy, Marshall M. Hogg, and Jeffrey B. Morganroth (Dkt. Nos. 18, 19, 22) are DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar" (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as "the bar of Texas" — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer