U.S. v. Alcantar, : 2:12-cr-00113-JCM-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180905a18
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Fourth Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between CRAIG W. DRUMMOND, ESQ., attorney for Defendant ROSALIO ALCANTAR and RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that the revocation hearing currently set for September 5, 2018 at 10:30am be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court approximately forty-five
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Fourth Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between CRAIG W. DRUMMOND, ESQ., attorney for Defendant ROSALIO ALCANTAR and RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that the revocation hearing currently set for September 5, 2018 at 10:30am be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court approximately forty-five ..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Fourth Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between CRAIG W. DRUMMOND, ESQ., attorney for Defendant ROSALIO ALCANTAR and RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that the revocation hearing currently set for September 5, 2018 at 10:30am be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court approximately forty-five (45) days from the current scheduled date.
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. The Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release alleges that the Defendant committed new offenses while under supervision.
2. The parties are attempting to resolve both the revocation proceedings and the new substantive offenses in a single agreement.
3. That the Defendant, Mr. Alcantar, was recently appointed CJA counsel, Mr. Lance Hendron, Esq. for his separate criminal matter ongoing with the United States Attorney's Office.
4. That time is needed for all concerned to review this other matter to see if resolution is possible of both matters and that such agreement may preclude the need for a contested revocation hearing.
5. That Mr. Alcantar is not in custody and does not object to this continuance.
6. This is the fourth request for a continuance of the revocation hearing.
ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Fourth Request)
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:
1. The Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release alleges that the Defendant committed new offenses while under supervision.
2. The parties are attempting to resolve both the revocation proceedings and the new substantive offenses in a single agreement.
3. That the Defendant, Mr. Alcantar, was recently appointed CJA counsel, Mr. Lance Hendron, Esq. for his separate criminal matter ongoing with the United States Attorney's Office.
4. That time is needed for all concerned to review this other matter to see if resolution is possible in both matters and that such agreement may preclude the need for a contested revocation hearing.
5. That Mr. Alcantar is not in custody and does not object to this continuance.
6. This is the fourth request for a continuance of the revocation hearing.
7. The parties have jointly requested that the hearing set for September 5, 2018 at 10:30am be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court in approximately forty-five (45) days of the present date.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the revocation hearing currently scheduled for September 5, 2018, at 10:30am is vacated and continued to October 29, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
Source: Leagle
