Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GANN v. HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:13-cv-71-DPM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20150420583 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . Gann's motion for reconsideration, No. 109, is denied. First, Gann makes a new argument, which is not properly asserted at this point because it was available before. Second, Gann relies on the faulty premise that the Court held that the policy was rescinded. It did not. The Court stated, as a matter of fact, that Household Life sent Gann the premiums that Ms. Griffin had paid instead of the policy proceeds. No. 107 at 2. The Court held that H
More

ORDER

Gann's motion for reconsideration, No. 109, is denied. First, Gann makes a new argument, which is not properly asserted at this point because it was available before. Second, Gann relies on the faulty premise that the Court held that the policy was rescinded. It did not. The Court stated, as a matter of fact, that Household Life sent Gann the premiums that Ms. Griffin had paid instead of the policy proceeds. No. 107 at 2. The Court held that Household Life was entitled to rescind under the statute, not that rescission had occurred. Finally, Household Life did not waive its statutory misrepresentation defense; nor were its rescission efforts improper. No good reason to reconsider the merits decision is presented by Gann's post-judgment motion. The Court appreciates Household Life's expedited response.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer