Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SPOONER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 13-159V. (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20140701853 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1 CHRISTIAN J. MORAN, Special Master. On May 29, 2014, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning final attorneys' fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, Ms. Spooner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs on May 13, 2014. The stipulation requests a total amount of $17,000.00. The Court awards this amount. Petitioner filed for compensation alleging that the hepatitis A vaccine caused her child, G.S., to suffer Guillain-Barr
More

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

CHRISTIAN J. MORAN, Special Master.

On May 29, 2014, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning final attorneys' fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, Ms. Spooner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs on May 13, 2014. The stipulation requests a total amount of $17,000.00. The Court awards this amount.

Petitioner filed for compensation alleging that the hepatitis A vaccine caused her child, G.S., to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome ("GBS"). Petitioner's claim was dismissed for insufficient proof. Decision, filed Jan. 16, 2014.

Even though compensation was denied, a petitioner who brings her petition in good faith and who has a reasonable basis for the petition may be awarded attorneys' fees and costs. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(1). Here, counsel for petitioner gathered and filed medical records and filed briefs in opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss, addressing a question of law with limited precedent regarding whether her lumbar puncture and IVIG therapy constituted a "surgical intervention." Thus, because petitioner's counsel acted in good faith and because there was a reasonable basis for proceeding, petitioner is eligible for an award of attorneys' fees and costs. Respondent does not contend that petitioner failed to satisfy these criteria.

Petitioner seeks $17,000.00 in attorneys' fees and costs for petitioner's counsel. Additionally, petitioner filed a statement of costs in compliance with General Order No. 9, stating that she incurred $350.00 while pursuing this claim. Respondent stated that she had no objection to the total award in the amount of $17,000.00 for attorneys' fees and costs.

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $17,000.00 in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and her counsel, Ronald C. Homer, Esq., of Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan for attorneys' fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

The court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Marc Langston, at (202) 357-6392.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer