Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. PIERCE, 10-CR-6096. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. New York Number: infdco20120222c96 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2012
Summary: DECISION and ORDER CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge. This case was referred by order of the undersigned, entered March 3, 2011, ECF No. 75 to Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On November 3, 2011, Defendant filed an omnibus motion, ECF No. 165, seeking inter alia suppression of statements made to law enforcement at the time of his arrest. On January 4, 2012, Magistrate Judge Feldman issued from the bench an oral Report and Recommendation ("R&R
More

DECISION and ORDER

CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

This case was referred by order of the undersigned, entered March 3, 2011, ECF No. 75 to Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On November 3, 2011, Defendant filed an omnibus motion, ECF No. 165, seeking inter alia suppression of statements made to law enforcement at the time of his arrest. On January 4, 2012, Magistrate Judge Feldman issued from the bench an oral Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), memorialized in an order entered on January 18, 2012, ECF No. 186, recommending that the Court deny Defendant's motion to suppress. The time has passed for Defendant to file any objections to the R&R, and none have been filed.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Feldman's R&R, Defendant's oral application to suppress statements is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer