Sgromo v. Bestway Enterprise Co., 2:19-cv-00060-JRG-RSP. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190926c85
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne dated August 29, 2019. (Dkt. No. 71.) Within this Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Payne concluded that Plaintiff Pietro Pasquale Antoni Sgromo ("Plaintiff") failed to show that he has proper standing for the asserted patents and the asserted trademark. ( Id. ) Consequently, Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) be GR
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne dated August 29, 2019. (Dkt. No. 71.) Within this Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Payne concluded that Plaintiff Pietro Pasquale Antoni Sgromo ("Plaintiff") failed to show that he has proper standing for the asserted patents and the asserted trademark. ( Id. ) Consequently, Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) be GRA..
More
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne dated August 29, 2019. (Dkt. No. 71.) Within this Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Payne concluded that Plaintiff Pietro Pasquale Antoni Sgromo ("Plaintiff") failed to show that he has proper standing for the asserted patents and the asserted trademark. (Id.) Consequently, Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) be GRANTED due to Plaintiff's lack of standing. (Dkt. No. 71.) Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 93.)
After reviewing the underlying briefing, the Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff's objection, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ADOPTED, and the objections are both OVERRULED.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
