Ancell v. McMahon, CV 16-02029 AB (DTBx). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200311962
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . After considering the moving and opposing pleadings and evidence, and having found, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 56, that the evidence shows there is no genuine issue of material fact that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. Judgment is to be entered in favor of defendants on the entire First Amended Complaint; and 2. Defendants are awarded their stat
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . After considering the moving and opposing pleadings and evidence, and having found, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 56, that the evidence shows there is no genuine issue of material fact that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. Judgment is to be entered in favor of defendants on the entire First Amended Complaint; and 2. Defendants are awarded their statu..
More
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
After considering the moving and opposing pleadings and evidence, and having found, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 56, that the evidence shows there is no genuine issue of material fact that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1. Judgment is to be entered in favor of defendants on the entire First Amended Complaint; and
2. Defendants are awarded their statutorily recoverable costs.
Source: Leagle
