Filed: Feb. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS JEN PROCESSING, LTD, JENNIFER NICOLE NEWNHAM, AND CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL NEWNHAM AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF MANOEL LEVEY WITH PREJUDICE WHEREAS, Plaintiff Skout, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed its First Amended Complaint for Breach of Contract; Fraud; Unfair or Deceptive Business Practices; Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; Violation of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Acces
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS JEN PROCESSING, LTD, JENNIFER NICOLE NEWNHAM, AND CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL NEWNHAM AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF MANOEL LEVEY WITH PREJUDICE WHEREAS, Plaintiff Skout, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed its First Amended Complaint for Breach of Contract; Fraud; Unfair or Deceptive Business Practices; Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; Violation of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS JEN PROCESSING, LTD, JENNIFER NICOLE NEWNHAM, AND CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL NEWNHAM AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF MANOEL LEVEY WITH PREJUDICE
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Skout, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed its First Amended Complaint for Breach of Contract; Fraud; Unfair or Deceptive Business Practices; Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; Violation of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act; and Violation of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act on May 29, 2015.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Jen Processing Ltd, Jennifer Nicole Newnham, and Christopher Russell Newnham (collectively, "Jen Processing Defendants") settled this matter on or about January 29, 2016.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and the Jen Processing Defendants through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice as to the Jen Processing Defendants pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A). The parties further stipulate that, except as set forth in the January 29, 2016 Settlement Agreement between them, the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees, expenses, and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED[ ORDER
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:
1. The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendants Jen Processing, Ltd, Jennifer Nicole Newnham, and Christopher Russell Newnham pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A).
2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the January 29, 2016 Settlement Agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
