Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RAMIREZ v. TAQUERIA SANTA ROSA, C13-05900-PJH. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140829t27 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR CONDUCTING A MEDIATION (ADR L.R. 6-5) JAMES S. COLLETTO, District Judge. TO THE HONORABLE COURT: The parties hereto, Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ; and DAREN HEATHERLY, and Defendants JAMES S. COLLETTO and JOHN V. COLLETTO, as Successor Co-trustees of the JOSEPH S. COLLETTO and ANN D. COLLETTO TRUST dated November 1, 1988, specifically as to Trust B of Said Trust, and FRANCISCO G. SAHAGUN, an individual dba TAQUERIA SANTA ROSA #1, by and through their co
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR CONDUCTING A MEDIATION (ADR L.R. 6-5)

JAMES S. COLLETTO, District Judge.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

The parties hereto, Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ; and DAREN HEATHERLY, and Defendants JAMES S. COLLETTO and JOHN V. COLLETTO, as Successor Co-trustees of the JOSEPH S. COLLETTO and ANN D. COLLETTO TRUST dated November 1, 1988, specifically as to Trust B of Said Trust, and FRANCISCO G. SAHAGUN, an individual dba TAQUERIA SANTA ROSA #1, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, this matter was referred to mediation on May 23, 2014;

WHEREAS, mediator John Vrieze was appointed mediator on June 27, 2014;

WHEREAS, the joint telephone conference, per ADR L.R. 6.6, was held by mediator John Vrieze, with counsel for the various parties, on July 23, 2014, during the course of which potential mediation dates were discussed. However, due to trial dates and related commitments, plaintiffs' counsel was unavailable on the dates proposed by mediator John Vrieze for the mediation.

WHEREAS, subsequent discussions have yet to result in an exact date for mediation; although, the likely date appears to lie in the last part of October or the first part of November, 2014.

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, pending approval by this Court, that the deadline for conducting the mediation be extended to November 30, 2014.

WHEREAS, there have been no prior extension of the deadline for conducting the mediation.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants do not anticipate that this extension of time will alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants through their respective counsel of record that the deadline for conducting the mediation be extended to November 30, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer