PARKER v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, 3:17-cv-01563-LB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170922807
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . On July 13, 2017, the court granted the City of Pittsburg's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 24.) The court gave Mr. Parker 28 days to file an amended complaint, but he did not do so. On August 25, 2017, the court further extended Mr. Parker's time to file an amended complaint to Tuesday, September 12, 2017, but
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . On July 13, 2017, the court granted the City of Pittsburg's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 24.) The court gave Mr. Parker 28 days to file an amended complaint, but he did not do so. On August 25, 2017, the court further extended Mr. Parker's time to file an amended complaint to Tuesday, September 12, 2017, but h..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
On July 13, 2017, the court granted the City of Pittsburg's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 24.) The court gave Mr. Parker 28 days to file an amended complaint, but he did not do so. On August 25, 2017, the court further extended Mr. Parker's time to file an amended complaint to Tuesday, September 12, 2017, but he did not do so. (ECF No. 25.) Accordingly, the court hereby dismisses this case without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
