Dietz v. Ford Motor Company, 2:18-cv-00737-MCE-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180427c62
Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER FOR COORDINATION WITH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is ex parte motion of defendant Ford Motor Company to stay proceedings until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decides whether to transfer this action to the Central District of California for inclusion in In re: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 PowerShift Transmission Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2814 (the MDL).
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER FOR COORDINATION WITH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is ex parte motion of defendant Ford Motor Company to stay proceedings until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decides whether to transfer this action to the Central District of California for inclusion in In re: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 PowerShift Transmission Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2814 (the MDL). ..
More
ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER FOR COORDINATION WITH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is ex parte motion of defendant Ford Motor Company to stay proceedings until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decides whether to transfer this action to the Central District of California for inclusion in In re: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 PowerShift Transmission Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2814 (the MDL).
Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS defendant's ex parte motion. This case is STAYED pending a final decision by the JPML whether to transfer this case for inclusion in the MDL. All filing deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED.
Not later than sixty days following the date this order is electronically filed, and every sixty days thereafter, the parties are directed to file a joint status report advising the Court as to the status of the JPML's decision to transfer this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
