Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRADLEY v. CROWLEY LINER SERVICES, 14-CV-02499-KAW. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150108942 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDERR KANDIS WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge. Defendants CROWLEY LINER SERVICES, FIDELIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. and M/V RESOLVE (collectively "Defendants"), and Plaintiff EVAN J. BRADLEY's ("Plaintiff"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his original complaint on May 30, 2014; WHEREAS, the initial Case Management Conference was scheduled for August 28, 2014 at 1:30 P.
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDERR

KANDIS WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.

Defendants CROWLEY LINER SERVICES, FIDELIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. and M/V RESOLVE (collectively "Defendants"), and Plaintiff EVAN J. BRADLEY's ("Plaintiff"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his original complaint on May 30, 2014;

WHEREAS, the initial Case Management Conference was scheduled for August 28, 2014 at 1:30 P.M.;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the initial Case Management Conference on August 19, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Court continued the initial Case Management Conference to October 28, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Court further continued the initial Case Management Conference to January 13, 2015 at 1:30 P.M.;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the original complaint on the original named defendants on November 3, 2014;

WHEREAS, those original defendants promptly notified Plaintiff of errors in his original complaint and identified the proper entities to be sued;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to file a First Amended Complaint naming the appropriate entities for clarity going forward in litigation;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed that First Amended Complaint on December 30, 2014;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the First Amended Complaint on Defendants on January 5, 2015;

WHEREAS, Defendant's Answer is not due until January 23, 2015;

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference on January 13, 2015 will be premature because the case will not be at issue;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:

The Initial Case Management Conference should be continued to a date on or after February 24, 2015.

Per Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Northern District of California, the filer attests that Edward M. Bull, III of Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP, counsel for Plaintiff Evan J. Bradley, as listed above and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in this filing's content and has authorized the filing hereof.

PROPOSED ORDER

Having read and considered the parties' Stipulation to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued to a date on or after February 24, 2015, at 1:30 P.M. in Courtroom 4.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer