Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fetch Media, Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., C 18-00015 WHA. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180628b12 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Our analysis begins with a "strong presumption" in favor of access to court records. Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 331 F.3d 1122 , 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). When the "good cause" standard applies there must be a "particularized showing" that specific harm or prejudice will result if the information is disclosed. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9t
More

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Our analysis begins with a "strong presumption" in favor of access to court records. Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). When the "good cause" standard applies there must be a "particularized showing" that specific harm or prejudice will result if the information is disclosed. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 2006). Furthermore, Civil Local Rule 79-5(b) requires administrative motions to file under seal to "be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material." Here, no good cause has been shown to seal all of Exhibits A through F to the complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff's overbroad sealing motion is DENIED.

Plaintiff may file a renewed administrative motion to file under seal by JULY 2 AT NOON. If the renewed motion is not narrowly tailored, it will be denied in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer