welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, E.D. California
  4. 2015
  5. WHITE v. SMYERS, 2:12-cv-2868 MCE AC P. (2015)

WHITE v. SMYERS, 2:12-cv-2868 MCE AC P. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150807809 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion, ECF No. 159, seeking additional time to file and serve his request for reconsideration of this court's order filed July 14, 2015, see ECF No. 153. Plaintiff has also filed a motion, ECF No. 160, for extension of time to file and serve a supplemental brief in accordance with the court's order filed July 14, 2015, see ECF No. 153 at 5. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 15
More

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion, ECF No. 159, seeking additional time to file and serve his request for reconsideration of this court's order filed July 14, 2015, see ECF No. 153. Plaintiff has also filed a motion, ECF No. 160, for extension of time to file and serve a supplemental brief in accordance with the court's order filed July 14, 2015, see ECF No. 153 at 5. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 159, for extension of time to file to file and serve his request for reconsideration of this court's order filed July 14, 2015 order, is granted. 2. Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 160, for extension of time to file a supplemental brief1 in accordance with this court's order filed July 14, 2015, is granted. 3. Plaintiff shall file and serve both matters on or before August 21, 2015. No further extensions of time will be granted.

4. Defendants may, but need not, file their respective responses to plaintiff's motions on or before September 4, 2015.

FootNotes


1. As this court previously circumscribed, "[a]ny further motion filed by plaintiff that requests additional discovery, responsive to this court's April 24, 2015 order [ECF No. 133], shall meet the [following] requirements, see ECF No. 153 at 4 n.3: [A] separate statement (no more than five pages in length, with no attached exhibits or supplemental filings) that sets forth the following information, excluding any reference to plaintiff's further deposition: (a) whether the responding party seeks further discovery; (b) if so, a brief description of the intended discovery, including the intended recipient(s), and an explanation why the discovery was not previously propounded; and (c) the importance of the anticipated discovery to the facts and claims in this action.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
2:12-cv-2868 MCE AC P.
Counsels
  • Thomas Allen Cregger
  • Ellen Y. Hung
  • Noah Garrett Blechman
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer