Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re LTC Holdings, Inc., 19-327-MN. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20190618b56 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2019
Summary: RECOMMENDATION BK Case No. 14-11111 (CSS). Adv. No. 15-51889 (CSS). BAP No. 19-9. MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 17 th day of June, 2019. WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, teleconferences were held on April 2, 2019 and June 5, 2019, after receipt of the parties' joint statement regarding mediation in this Bankruptcy a
More

RECOMMENDATION

BK Case No. 14-11111 (CSS).

Adv. No. 15-51889 (CSS).

BAP No. 19-9.

At Wilmington this 17th day of June, 2019.

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, teleconferences were held on April 2, 2019 and June 5, 2019, after receipt of the parties' joint statement regarding mediation in this Bankruptcy appeal for initial review and discussion with counsel to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;

WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.

The parties further request that the following briefing schedule be entered for this appeal:

Appellant's Opening Brief August 9, 2019 Appellee's Answering Brief September 30, 2019 Appellants' Reply Brief October 30, 2019

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. Because this Recommendation is consistent with the parties' requests, objections to this recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1 are not anticipated

Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer