HUERTA v. ADAMS, SACV 11-1045-RGK (JPR). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120416383
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. On March 26, 2012, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, in which he essentially repeats the arguments in the Petition and Traverse. Having reviewed de novo those portions of the record to which objections have been made, the C
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. On March 26, 2012, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, in which he essentially repeats the arguments in the Petition and Traverse. Having reviewed de novo those portions of the record to which objections have been made, the Co..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. On March 26, 2012, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, in which he essentially repeats the arguments in the Petition and Traverse. Having reviewed de novo those portions of the record to which objections have been made, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied without leave to amend and this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
