Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WALLERSTEIN v. DOLE FRESH VEGETABLES, INC., C13-1284 YGR. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130624960 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF TRACI WALLERSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE PORTIONS THEREOF YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge. WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, plaintiff Traci Wallerstein ("Plaintiff") filed her First Amended Complaint (the "FAC") against defendant Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc. ("Dole"); WHEREAS, on June 11, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Traci Wall
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF TRACI WALLERSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE PORTIONS THEREOF

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, plaintiff Traci Wallerstein ("Plaintiff") filed her First Amended Complaint (the "FAC") against defendant Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc. ("Dole");

WHEREAS, on June 11, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Traci Wallerstein's First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Strike Portions Thereof;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due on June 25, 2013;

WHEREAS, Dole's reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss is currently due on July 2, 2013;

WHEREAS, the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for October 15, 2013;

WHEREAS, the parties need additional time to prepare opposition and reply briefs;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties may request through stipulation, an order changing time that would not affect the date of an event or deadline already fixed by Court order, or that would accelerate or extend time frames set in the Local Rules or in the Federal Rules;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Plaintiff shall file her opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by no later than July 26, 2013;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Dole shall file its reply brief in support of the Motion to Dismiss by no later than August 23, 2013;

WHEREAS, this stipulated briefing schedule is not being sought for purposes of delay, but rather so that this matter may be fairly and reasonably litigated and so that justice may be done;

WHEREAS, no prior extension concerning the Motion to Dismiss has been requested or obtained.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Dole that:

Plaintiff shall file her opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by no later than July 26, 2013.

Dole shall file its reply brief in support of the Motion to Dismiss by no later than August 23, 2013.

The October 15, 2013 hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss will remain unchanged.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer