Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Elaimy, 2:18-CV-00216-SMJ (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180821e39 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS VICKI PECKHAM AND SPOKANE COUNTY SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court are the parties' stipulated dismissals of Defendant Vicki Peckham, ECF No. 8, and Defendant Spokane County, ECF No. 9. Consistent with the parties' agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and (B), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties' stipulated dismissals of Defendant Vicki Peckham, ECF No. 8, and Defendant Spokane County, ECF No. 9, are ACKNO
More

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS VICKI PECKHAM AND SPOKANE COUNTY

Before the Court are the parties' stipulated dismissals of Defendant Vicki Peckham, ECF No. 8, and Defendant Spokane County, ECF No. 9. Consistent with the parties' agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and (B), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The parties' stipulated dismissals of Defendant Vicki Peckham, ECF No. 8, and Defendant Spokane County, ECF No. 9, are ACKNOWLEDGED. 2. All claims against Vicki Peckham and Spokane County are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 3. The Clerk's Office is directed to AMEND the caption as follows: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAITH ELAIMY; ABIR ELAIMY, a/k/a ABEER ELAIMY; and SETERUS, INC., Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to all counsel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer