Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Suggs v. U.S., 14-349-2. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181126712 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20th day of November 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner Derrick Suggs' pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. No. 175), the Government's Response to Petitioner's Motion (Doc. No. 185), and in accordance with the Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. No. 175) is D
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of November 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner Derrick Suggs' pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 175), the Government's Response to Petitioner's Motion (Doc. No. 185), and in accordance with the Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 175) is DENIED. 2. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000). 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer