Connolly v. Batinovich, 16-cv-02131-DMR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180222c36
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO APPEAR AT FEBRUARY 21, 2018 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court held a case management conference today in the above-entitled case. Defendant Victor A. Batinovich ("Mr. Batinovich") did not appear. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by March 7, 2018, Mr. Batinovich shall respond in writing explaining why he should not be sanctioned for failing to appear at the February 21, 2
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO APPEAR AT FEBRUARY 21, 2018 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court held a case management conference today in the above-entitled case. Defendant Victor A. Batinovich ("Mr. Batinovich") did not appear. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by March 7, 2018, Mr. Batinovich shall respond in writing explaining why he should not be sanctioned for failing to appear at the February 21, 20..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO APPEAR AT FEBRUARY 21, 2018 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
The court held a case management conference today in the above-entitled case. Defendant Victor A. Batinovich ("Mr. Batinovich") did not appear.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by March 7, 2018, Mr. Batinovich shall respond in writing explaining why he should not be sanctioned for failing to appear at the February 21, 2018 Case Management Conference. Failure to file a timely response to this order to show cause may result in the striking of Mr. Batinovich's Answer and entering default judgment against him.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
