EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The above-captioned matter was originally assigned to the Honorable United States District Judge Charles Breyer. On August 22, 2017, this Court entered a Related Case Order finding that this case is related to several others within the meaning of Criminal Local Rule 8-1(b).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the status conference in the above-captioned matter shall be set for
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the time between the filing of this stipulation on August 25, 2017, and the status conference on September 27, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until September 27, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
It is hereby ORDERED that the status conference in the above-captioned matter be set for September 27, 2017, at 2:30 pm.
It is further ORDERED that the time from August 25, 2017, until September 27, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). The Court finds that the exclusion of the period from August 25, 2017, to September 27, 2017, from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, is warranted; that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in the prompt disposition of this criminal case; and that the failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would unreasonably deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).