Broyles v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., 3:10-857 JJB-CBW. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20170719c34
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2017
Summary: SECOND REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER C. MICHAEL HILL , Special Master . The Defendants, Stone and Young and Anthony Guaimano (the "S&Y Parties"), have filed an Ex Parte Motion to Strike [Rec. Doc. 114], it's prior Response and Motion to Strike and Correct Inaccuracies [Rec. Doc. 110], on the grounds that it is duplicative with other pleadings [Rec. Doc. 112 and 113] filed in compliance with the direction of the undersigned. This Motion [Rec. Doc. 114] has been referred to the undersigned. [Re
Summary: SECOND REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER C. MICHAEL HILL , Special Master . The Defendants, Stone and Young and Anthony Guaimano (the "S&Y Parties"), have filed an Ex Parte Motion to Strike [Rec. Doc. 114], it's prior Response and Motion to Strike and Correct Inaccuracies [Rec. Doc. 110], on the grounds that it is duplicative with other pleadings [Rec. Doc. 112 and 113] filed in compliance with the direction of the undersigned. This Motion [Rec. Doc. 114] has been referred to the undersigned. [Rec..
More
SECOND REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
C. MICHAEL HILL, Special Master.
The Defendants, Stone and Young and Anthony Guaimano (the "S&Y Parties"), have filed an Ex Parte Motion to Strike [Rec. Doc. 114], it's prior Response and Motion to Strike and Correct Inaccuracies [Rec. Doc. 110], on the grounds that it is duplicative with other pleadings [Rec. Doc. 112 and 113] filed in compliance with the direction of the undersigned. This Motion [Rec. Doc. 114] has been referred to the undersigned. [Rec Doc. 144]. No opposition has been filed.
I find that the Motion is well founded and without apparent opposition. Therefore, for the reasons set out in the said motion;
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT "The Motion to Strike Rec. Doc. 110". [Rec. Doc. 114].
Any party wishing to object to this Recommendation shall file its objections no later than 7 days from service of this Recommendation.1
FootNotes
1. Because the Motion was filed ex parte, and because there was no opposition filed to the Motion, the undersigned has lessened the time delay for opposition from 21 to 7 days from the date of service.
Source: Leagle
