CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Subject to the approval of the Court, all documents, material or information produced or created by a party or non-party ("Source") to a party in this action ("Receiving Party") containing information which the Source or a party believes in good faith to be confidential or trade secret information, shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL, CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION, or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY by the Source or a party and maintained by the Receiving Party(ies) pursuant to the terms of this Order.
It is the intent of the parties and the Court that information will not be designated as confidential in this case for tactical reasons, and that nothing shall be designated without a good faith belief that there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record. The parties are both artists whose work depicts ocean scenes and who sell their work directly to the public or via third parties. Because of the parties' status as competitors or potential competitors, business information such as supplier lists, customer lists, cost-of-goods sold, pricing, manufacturing agreements, and other, similar information are confidential and must be protected from disclosure, and with highly sensitive information, safeguards are necessary to limit the disclosure of such information to opposing parties and/or other competitors in the market so as to avoid competitive harm.
Further, the threshold issues in the complaint center on copyright infringement and breach of contract allegations. Resolution of the copyright issues and damages analysis necessarily require evidence of, without limitation, customer lists, cost of manufacture, supplier lists, sales data, and channels of trade. Resolution of the breach of contract issues necessarily involves evidence of a prior settlement agreement between the parties which was subject to a confidentiality clause.
Examples of confidential information that the parties may seek to protect from unrestricted or unprotected public disclosure include:
(a) Information that is the subject of a contractual non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement or obligation;
(b) The names, or other information tending to reveal the identity of a party's supplier, distributor, or manufacturer;
(c) Agreements with third parties, including license agreements, distributor agreements, manufacturing agreements, gallery or consignment agreements, supply agreements, sales agreements, or service agreements;
(d) Information related to budgets, sales, profits, costs, margins, licensing, product pricing, or other internal financial/accounting information, including non-public information related to financial condition or performance and income or other non-public tax information;
(e) Information related to internal operations including personnel information;
(f) Trade secrets (as defined by the jurisdiction in which the information is located).
Federal Rule Civil Procedure Rule 26(c)(7) and Local Rules 141 and 141.1 permit the grant of a protective order upon a showing of good cause, and provides that the protection of a trade secret or other confidential commercial information is a proper basis for the issuance of a protective order. The party seeking such an order must demonstrate a particular and specific need for the protective order. Gary v. Rodewald, 133 F.R.D. 39, 40 (N.D. Cal. 1990).
A protective order that focuses on preventing disclosure of particular information, e.g. confidential business information, where disclosure would "likely cause serious harm," is supported by good cause. Hayden v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., 106 F.R.D. 551, 556, (S.D.N.Y. 1985). To support a showing of good cause, however, a protective order must be sufficiently tailored in the information it seeks to protect, e.g., by designating certain classes or types of information. Id.
A "blanket" protective order, as opposed to a broader "umbrella" protective order, "permits the parties to protect the documents that they in good faith believe contain trade secrets or other confidential commercial information. Such protective orders are routinely agreed to by the parties and approved by the courts in commercial litigation, especially in cases between direct competitors." Bayer AG and Miles Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., 162 F.R.D. 456, 465, (S.D.N.Y. 1995).
Finally, the parties to this action entered into a previous settlement agreement that is confidential under its own terms and cannot be publicly disclosed by either party without breaching the agreement.
As competitors, the parties' proposed protective order is drafted to protect the confidentiality and disclosure of each party's confidential business information and to provide extra precautions on the disclosure of highly sensitive business information, as defined below, and as balanced against the need and use for such information to prosecute and defend this action.
Based on the foregoing demonstration of good cause in support of the [Proposed] Protective Order, this Order should be granted by the Court to protect that parties' confidential business information.
In accordance with Rule 26(c) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules 141 and 141.1 the parties stipulate and agree, through their respective counsel, to the entry of a protective order governing the disclosure during pretrial discovery and the subsequent handling of trade secret information, proprietary information, other confidential commercial, financial or personal information, and documents containing any such information as follows:
a. Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY is information that has not been made public and which concerns or relates to the processes, operations, type or work, or apparatus, or to the production, sales, shipments, purchases, transfers, identification of customers and suppliers, inventories, blueprints, amount or source of any income, profits, losses, or expenditures of any persons, firm, partnership, corporation or other organization, the disclosure of which information may have the effect of causing harm to the competitive position of the person, firm, partnership, corporation or to the organization from which the information was obtained, and, to the extent not already encompassed in the preceding definition, trade secrets as defined in California Civil Code § 426.1.
b. The parties may designate discovery material or testimony that disclose the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the parties on October 5, 2001 ("Settlement Agreement") as CONFIDENTIAL in the manner described in paragraph 1 above. The parties agree that the Settlement Agreement itself is confidential under its own terms and may not be disclosed, except as provided by the Settlement Agreement itself and according to paragraph 3.3 below. Nothing contained in this Order shall constitute a waiver of the confidentiality of the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
c. By designating a document, thing, material, testimony or other information derived therefrom as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Order, the party making the designation is certifying to the court that there is a good faith basis both in law and in fact for the designation within the meaning of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(g). Material designated as confidential under the Order, the information contained therein, and any documents derived in whole or in part from material designated as confidential or that is confidential under its own term\ ("CONFIDENTIAL \") shall only be used for the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action, and for no other purpose.
a. The parties and employees of the parties, but only to the extent necessary to participate in, assist in and monitor the progress of this action and for no other purpose;
b. Qualified persons taking testimony involving CONFIDENTIAL material, and necessary stenographic, videographic, and clerical personnel thereof;
c. Consultants or experts and their staff who are employed for the purposes of this litigation, provided that the provisions of Paragraph 3.3 of this Stipulation are complied with prior to any disclosure of any CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL to such an expert or consultant;
d. The Court, and the Court's staff, pursuant to Paragraph 3.6 of this Stipulation;
e. Attorneys for the parties to this litigation and/or the insurance carriers for the parties to the litigation, including persons working solely in secretarial, clerical, and paralegal capacities, and who are providing assistance to counsel in this action, and/or claims representatives and/or claims adjustors, upon the condition that such CONFIDENTIAL material not be used in policy issuance determinations and be immediately destroyed by the insurance carriers upon completion of the instant litigation;
f. Third-parties specifically retained to assist outside counsel in copying, imaging, and/or coding of documents but for that purpose only, provided that all such CONFIDENTIAL material is kept and maintained in a separate and secure place and that the third party retained to copy, image, or code confidential documents is not currently performing any services, either as an employee, consultant, or otherwise for any competitor of either party to this action or for one having any interest adverse to either party to this action;
g. The author, addressees and recipients of the documents or any person who would have had access to such information by virtue of his/her employment; and,
h. Any other person as to whom the parties previously agree in writing. Such disclosures are authorized only to the extent necessary to prosecute or defend this litigation. There will be no disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL material to any person or entity who is a manufacturer or retail competitor (or an employee of a manufacturer or retail competitor) of a party. There will be no disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL material to any distributor or supplier (or an employees of a distributor or supplier) of a party unless within 14 days of written notice by the party wishing disclosure, either the parties agree to the terms of disclosure or the party seeking to make a disclosure files a motion for an order permitting the disclosure and the court so orders.
Individuals who are authorized to review CONFIDENTIAL material pursuant to this Stipulation shall hold the CONFIDENTIAL material and its contents in confidence and shall not divulge the CONFIDENTIAL material or its contents, either verbally or in writing, except as expressly permitted by this Stipulation, unless authorized to do so by a further Order of this Court or as specifically required by law.
This order shall be binding on the parties when signed regardless of whether and when this Court endorses this Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.