Filed: Dec. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2016
Summary: AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FRANKLIN L. NOEL , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge on December 12, 2016, on Defendant Lachlan Scott McConnell's motion to dismiss or in the alternative for severance (ECF No. 673). This matter was referred to the undersigned for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule 72.1. For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends that Defendant's motion be DENIED. I. FACTUAL
Summary: AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FRANKLIN L. NOEL , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge on December 12, 2016, on Defendant Lachlan Scott McConnell's motion to dismiss or in the alternative for severance (ECF No. 673). This matter was referred to the undersigned for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule 72.1. For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends that Defendant's motion be DENIED. I. FACTUAL ..
More
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
FRANKLIN L. NOEL, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge on December 12, 2016, on Defendant Lachlan Scott McConnell's motion to dismiss or in the alternative for severance (ECF No. 673). This matter was referred to the undersigned for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.1. For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends that Defendant's motion be DENIED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On November 13, 2013, a Grand Jury returned an Indictment, charging Defendant Lachlan Scott McConnell with multiple counts of conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud, and unlawful distribution and dispensing of controlled substances. See Indictment, ECF No. 5. On April 19, 2016, McConnell was arrested in the Philippines on an outstanding warrant related to the 2013 Indictment. On June 1, 2016, McConnell was transported from the Philippines to the United States. Testimony at the November 9, 2016, suppression hearing established that during this time, Government agents seized multiple computers and external hard drives possessed by McConnell. On November 23, 2016, the Court held that production of this material is governed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, and set December 6, 2016, as the deadline for the Government to comply with its discovery obligations. See Order 4, ECF No. 668. At the December 12, 2016, hearing, McConnell represented that the Government produced the requested Rule 16 discovery between December 2, 2016, and December 8, 2016, with the exception of 213 documents that the Government maintains are classified. On December 10, 2016, the Government filed a notice of intent to invoke the Classified Information Procedures Act ("CIPA"). Gov't Notice, ECF No. 681. McConnell now moves to dismiss the Indictment or, in the alternative, for severance, for the Government's failure to produce discovery under Rule 16. Def.'s Mot. to Dismiss 1-2, ECF No. 673.
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Rule 16(d) provides that:
(2) Failure to Comply. If a party fails to comply with this rule, the court may:
(A) order that party to permit the discovery or inspection; specify its time, place, and manner; and prescribe other just terms and conditions;
(B) grant a continuance;
(C) prohibit that party from introducing the undisclosed evidence; or
(D) enter any other order that is just under the circumstance.
Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(2). The Court concludes that the Government has substantially complied with the November 23, 2016, Order, and its discovery obligations under Rule 16. Although the Government did not produce the entirety of requested discovery by December 6, 2016, the parties agree that the remainder of the requested discovery was prodcued by December 8, 2016, except the 213 purportedly classified documents. Under the circumstances, the Court finds that a two-day discovery delay does not warrant dismissal. See United States v. DeCoteau, 186 F.3d 1008, 1010 (8th Cir. 1999) (holding that a court must impose the least severe sanction upon the government for failure to comply with a court order). As to the 213 allegedly classified documents, McConnell may move for the appropriate relief related to those documents under CIPA at a later date before the presiding judge. See 18 U.S.C. App. III. However, as is stands, the Court cannot find that McConnell is entitled to the relief sought in the instant motion.1
III. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the foregoing, and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendant Lachlan Scott McConnell's motion to dismiss or in the alternative for severance (ECF No. 673) be DENIED.
