Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Breneman, Inc., 4:16-cv-01640-YGR (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180425a06 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: REPORT & RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . The Application for Order To Show Cause by Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Pension Trust Fund For Northern California and Board of Trustees of the Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fu
More

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Application for Order To Show Cause by Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Pension Trust Fund For Northern California and Board of Trustees of the Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fund for Northern California ("Laborers Trust Funds") and Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund For Northern California and Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Training Trust Fund for Northern California ("Cement Masons Trust Funds") came on regularly for hearing on April 3, 2018.

Counsel for plaintiffs Laborers Trust Funds and Cement Masons Trust Funds appeared for the hearing. Counsel for defendants Breneman, Inc. and James G. Breneman failed to file an opposition, after having requested a continuance of the original application hearing date and extension of time to file an opposition, [Dkt. Nos. 108, 111]. Further, counsel for defendants failed to appear on April 3, 2018 for the hearing.

Pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 636(e)(6)(B)(iii), the following facts are hereby certified to the Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers:

• Defendants failed to appear at the Order of Examination ordered for February 20, 2018 [Dkt. Nos. 85-88] • Defendants failed to appear at the continued Order of Examination ordered for March 6, 2018 [Dkt. Nos. 92, 93, 96, 97] • Defendants failed to file an opposition to plaintiffs' Application for Order to Show Cause; and • Neither Defendants nor their counsel appeared for the hearing ordered for April 3, 2018 [Dkt. No. 107] after having requested a continuance of the original application hearing date of March 20, 2018 [Dkt. No. 108].

Having considered the above facts and the papers in support of plaintiffs' Application for Order to Show Cause, no opposition having been filed, and good cause appearing therefore,

The Court recommends that the District Judge grant Plaintiffs' application for an Order that defendants James G. Breneman and Breneman, Inc. show cause why they should not be held in contempt of court and issued a monetary sanction for failure to appear, twice, for an Order of Examination and further, failure to appear the court's April 3, 2018 hearing, and why a bench warrant should not be issued for defendant James G. Breneman's violation of two court orders to appear for examination.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer