Filed: Jul. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Third Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between CRAIG W. DRUMMOND, ESQ., attorney for Defendant ROSALIO ALCANTAR and RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that the revocation hearing currently set for July 31, 2018 at and time convenient to this Court approximately thirty (30 This Stipulation is entered into for th
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Third Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between CRAIG W. DRUMMOND, ESQ., attorney for Defendant ROSALIO ALCANTAR and RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that the revocation hearing currently set for July 31, 2018 at and time convenient to this Court approximately thirty (30 This Stipulation is entered into for the..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Third Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between CRAIG W.
DRUMMOND, ESQ., attorney for Defendant ROSALIO ALCANTAR and RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, that the revocation hearing currently set for July 31, 2018 at and time convenient to this Court approximately thirty (30
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons
1. The Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release alleges that the Defendant committed new offenses while under supervision.
2. The parties are attempting to resolve both the revocation proceedings and the new substantive offenses in a single agreement.
3. That such agreement may preclude the need for a contested revocation hearing.
4. That the Defendant, Mr. Alcantar, is in the process of obtaining Act (CJA Office.
5. Further that counsel for the Defendant, Craig W. Drummond, will be involved in a court-martial and Nellis, Air Force Base, Nevada from approximately July 30-31, 2018 in the matter of United States v. Hawkins.
6. That Mr. Alcantar is not in custody and does not object to this continuance.
7. This is the third request for a continuance of the revocation hearing.
ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (Third Request)
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:
1. The Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release alleges that the Defendant committed new offenses while under supervision.
2. The parties are attempting to resolve both the revocation proceedings and the new substantive offenses in a single agreement.
3. That such agreement may preclude the need for a contested revocation hearing.
4. That the Defendant, Mr. Alcantar, is in the process of obtaining Criminal Justice Act (CJA) counsel for his separate criminal matter ongoing with the United States Attorney's Office.
5. Further that counsel for the Defendant, Craig W. Drummond, will be involved in a courtmartial and Nellis, Air Force Base, Nevada from approximately July 30-31, 2018 in the matter of United States v. Hawkins.
6. That Mr. Alcantar is not in custody and does not object to this continuance.
7. This is the third request for a continuance of the revocation hearing.
8. The parties have jointly requested that the hearing set for July 31, 2018 at 10:00am be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court in approximately thirty (30) days of the present date.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the revocation hearing currently scheduled for July 31, 2018, at 10:00am is vacated and continued to September 5, 2018 at 10:30 a.m.
